What Does It Say?
Science is currently divided into two categories, the atheistic one which is currently dominant (even if the trend is slowly reversing) and the non-atheistic one. By atheist we mean that science that does not want to hear about God and that denies him unconditionally for an act of "faith", given that they cannot demonstrate the opposite of what we are going to demonstrate in this article.
Let us then remember that all the greatest discoverers and scientists believed in God and there is a reason which however we will discuss elsewhere.
Some scientists have tried to look for evidence of His existence and in some cases have even done a great job proving that God exists. But, although the evidence provided in these works has never been denied, the majority of scientists do not believe in God, mocking their colleagues who believe in Him not much by faith but for a logic that cannot be denied.
Among the most famous scientists who believe in a creator God it is enough to mention Albert Einstein but we could give a list of hundreds of names, among the most famous of all eras such as Pythagoras, Leonardo Da Vinci, Enrico Fermi, Nikola Tesla and many others.
The Methods Used
Assuming that God is in everything, it is obvious that his existence cannot be demonstrated starting from the visible matter.
It would be as if a single cell of our body were trying to prove that we exist.
Therefore, in order to be able to say that something greater than us exists and is the creator of everything, we must first find God in his works, laws and creations and to do this we need a paradigm shift, which is inevitable for demonstrate things greater than us. Science is used to this type of demonstration starting from axioms as well as direct observations and therefore there should be no problems if we also do the same.
However, we are not talking about an act of faith, as the church does, but about endorsing findings that are in most cases logical, demonstrable and indisputable.
Conventional Sources
What do the sacred texts of all religions say about God?
We'll keep it short, they say almost nothing. They name him, they say that he is the Father and the builder of everything but they don't say much else. This is for three fundamental reasons:
- all sacred texts were written in remote times.
- in those times there was no great knowledge about the world and the universe.
- to make people understand what they could, they had to express themselves through metaphors.
It talks about some of His interventions or, as in the gospels, it talks about His Son and His works and His life and even the Son almost never talks about his Father. He mentions Him, He uses some metaphors but nothing more.
We Ask Questions
Science says and repeats that everything was born from chaos: the universe, life, man, etc.
- But have they ever observed anything resembling chaos in nature?
- Have they ever noticed that this phantom chaos does not exist and that everything is orderly arranged?
Obviously not!
Chaos theory also has a very funny incipit. Created and theorized for the first time by Edward Lorenz, a meteorologist who tried to determine the evolution of atmospheric conditions, he realized that small variations in the initial conditions were capable of producing large variations in the long-term behavior of a
system.
But what does all this mean? Well, simply that "chaos" does not exist because, as described, very small variations in the system would be enough to upset and bring down the entire universal construction. Of course, not overnight but those changes (depending on which ones and to what extent) would risk spreading in a chain over time at a global level. A bit like what is happening today thanks to the thousands of nuclear bombs launched by our governments as tests of who knows what!
What does this demonstrate?
Simple, that chaos does not exist and that everything is regulated millimetrically!
But regulated by who or what?
There is no trace of "chaos" in nature! Why is everything so orderly?
Let's take the example of DNA, a simple but structurally complex code that teaches cells how to correctly assemble amino acids to form the proteins that make up all organisms. If DNA holds the blueprint to create proteins useful to the cell, and DNA cannot function without 75 pre-existing proteins, we arrive at a paradox! It means that proteins and DNA must have existed simultaneously and consequently created at the same moment.
But let's get to pure mathematics with the calculation of probabilities.
Scientists of any field know well how many physical laws exist, they know well that these laws hold for our entire universeand which are those laws that govern it in some way. They know well how many dimensions exist, how many particles exist, how large and complex a DNA molecule is, they know that the atom and the sub-atom exist, they know all these things and many more and many more they will have to discover, they ultimately know how complex the universe is in its visible simplicity.
What are the chances that such a "machine" (the entire universe) has generated by chance from nothing with all this complexity and delicate stability?
We'll tell you: equal to zero.
However, we already know the answers that those who define themselves as "men of science" will give, and they will be along the lines of: "we were simply lucky," making themselves RIDICULOUS! Or they will respond with the usual nonsense of time, according to which chaos had billions of years to find a balance, thus making themselves even more RIDICULOUS because our galaxy, for example, according to various observations, is dated at 13.8 billion years while the entire universe is approximately 26.7 billion years old. But these are only estimates; the important things are the rules that govern the entire universe and apply to every galaxy, every solar system, every planet, every life, every cell.
How could the universe have condensed and formed all at the same time? How could the intricate rules that govern it and make it stable have all formed at the same instant?
Where did these rules come from and how did they generate so quickly, even immediately starting to generate galaxies, worlds and of course life?
As usual, they will respond with the usual banality of time and the classic theory of evolution, which means: "by chance." This is how a science dedicated to finding answers manages to trivialize everything with a simple "by chance."
These, however, are just some questions to which they can never respond scientifically or theologically.
Certainly, not knowing something doesn't mean it can never be known through new studies and scientific evidence. However, these and many other questions, which we'll spare you, are of such magnitude that it will be impossible to have an answer without admitting that an "architect", infinitely more "intelligent" than us, designed them!
Science teaches us that:
- you don't get something out of nothing
- order cannot be obtained from chaos
- an explosion like the famous big bang destroys, it does not create or produce anything!
Order is not obtained from chaos. In chaos there is no order unless it is imparted to it in some way.
However, let's talk in scientific terms and mention the second law of thermodynamics which with entropy provides a tool for measuring disorder:
“The entropy of an isolated system increases during any spontaneous transformation”
The key words are therefore "isolated“, “increases" And "spontaneous transformation“.
Let's ask ourselves then:
- Is the universe an isolated system?
According to science, yes! - Il disordine sta aumentando nell’universo a causa del fantomatico big-bang?
Definitely no! - is the universe the derivative of a spontaneous transformation and is this transformation still ongoing?
Let's say we don't know!
Now, we admit for an instant that science is right and that our universe is an isolated system and that is that it does not exchange matter or energy with the outside and that it was formed by the big bang and therefore by a spontaneous transformation. But if we observe life and how it maintains and evolves we discover that it is anything but chaotic. In nature there is no disorder but absolute order and therefore... life disobeys to the second law of thermodynamics?
DECIDEDLY NO because many, if not all, of the chemical reactions that enable life are not spontaneous. So, we should admit that there is a force acting from the outside that, in determining how we lead our lives, is us... but in the case of the entire universe?
We should also admit that our universe is not isolated and that it was not formed by a spontaneous transformation but by something that acted from the outside... and so?
The Law of Cause and Effect is one of the inviolable laws of our entire universe and therefore:
Who or what would have imparted such an order and would therefore be the cause?
Science wants to call it "chance" instead of God? ...free to do so, but at least have the decency and respect to use the uppercase C because this "chance" demonstrates intelligence!
Do we want to call it "nature"? ...but nature has an origin and follows very precise rules (chemists and biologists know this well), therefore returning to the beginning of the discussion and therefore to the rules that govern it and what the cause of these rules may be.
For those skeptical mathematicians who then insist on denying the evidence, as if they were children, why does it seem that everything revolves around what they call the Fibonacci sequence or the golden ratio?
How come all life and the entire creation revolves around math formulas very precise?
Chaos as such has no rules nor does luck or chance create them!
So what are these gentlemen studying, and why do they persist in seeking a rule where there shouldn't be one?
Consequently, they are mocking you from childhood, teaching you completely wrong things! And such MISTAKES, but we could call them crimes as they are made knowingly, have been repeated in every generation, binding humanity to a miserable existence made of fables.
One does not want to realize that ALL these questions and the many others we could ask lead to a single answer!
So, who are those who are persisting in an act of faith against all logic?
Those who believe in God, finding Him every day in reason, logic, mathematics, physics, biology, or those who continue to fantasize, without providing answers, eventually denying the evidence?
We have even reached the point where, if a scientist claimed that God exists, he would be kicked out, derided, set aside by colleagues and scientific institutions. A violence against what is the beginning of scientific research, asking questions, whatever they may be, and seeking answers.
As if logic were not a science but a simple philosopher's expedient!
The science of matter is not new to hypothesizing something it cannot see. Many examples from scientific literature could be cited. So why can't the same be done with the science of the spirit, seeking answers in that direction instead of systematically denying everything?
Who or What is God
God is everything and is in everything. It is the instrument used by the Holy Spirit, which is that Primordial Intelligence, that Architect of both the visible and invisible, material and immaterial things. The Holy Spirit has defined the rules, the Laws on which our and other universes are founded, and the multiple dimensions contained within them.
Spirito Santo
The Beginning
DIO
The Cosmos
The manifested idea
Cristo
The Universe
Uomo
Created in the image and likeness of God
This glycoprotein is fundamental not only for organizing cells into tissues, but also during development, as it directs cell migration.
Seen under a microscope, it takes on the shape of a cross, so much so that a well-known biochemist said:
“Our knowledge of the truth is most clearly revealed on the cross of Christ, and what holds our human body together (the Laminina), is it coincidental that it is shaped like a cross? Some might say yes, but I think it's yet another way God reveals his glory to us. I think God is the one who holds all things together, our bodies, our world and our lives“.
Another biochemist, Dr. Fazale Rana said:
“There are many more substantive ways to use biochemistry: discuss the need for a Creator… I became a Christian when I was studying biochemistry. The cell in its complexity, the elegance, the refinement and the inadequacy of the evolutionary scenarios regarding the origin of life, pushed me to conclude that life must derive from a Creator"
We could have filled pages and pages with examples that irrefutably demonstrate that there is an order, harmony, and predetermined elegance in all things, from the largest to the smallest and most microscopic, with similarities that leave no room or should leave no room for misunderstandings or other interpretations.
Science should be the first to recognize the existence of God because it can see and touch the perfection behind everything, behind every fragile structure where just one thing out of place could make everything collapse. Yet, it is the first to deny it.
How much ignorance!
How much pride!!
How much cruelty!!!
The real "chaos" is the destruction that has always loomed over all humanity on this planet, due to its blindness, obstinacy, and desire to feel like gods (ignorant ones) while remaining doubly bound to material things such as: career, fame, glory, notoriety, parties, food, and above all money. All these things are fueled by that negative and tentative sphere that only sought the destruction of order and love. From that antithesis that the church calls Satan, Demon, Lucifer!
But the blame for the destruction of order is solely ours because the evil one, acting by the will of God, can only tempt the spirit, never force it, always leaving the freedom of choice that is solely ours, just like the merits and faults that result from the actions WE decide to take.
We are still in time to understand that order arises only from love and that there is no life without our God, the primary cause, and that there is no life without the Sun, and that our ancestors knew these things very well. They did not worship the sun as a celestial body, but because in that forge dwell the Gods and our Lord and Creator.
Every effect has a cause, just as the primary cause of the entire creation is the Holy Spirit. The true God whom we still do not know or understand, and whom we erroneously continue to consider as a tool, but who instead, as we have seen, is the primary cause of everything.
Watch the video
Discover more inside our channel.